- Reader Case: From Cancer Survivor to FIRE - September 1, 2026
- The FIRE Guide to America’s Health Care System (2026) - July 7, 2026
- Planting Your Money Trees - February 23, 2026
It’s been another whirlwind week in the news, and I haven’t really been commenting on most of what the Trump administration has been doing because, quite frankly, I can’t keep track of all of it. Even limiting my attention to trade and finance related issues, tariff announcements that seem like a big deal just get walked back a few days later. Even last week’s supposedly bombshell revelation that a federal court ruled all the tariffs illegal, briefly sending stock market future soaring, another court blocked the decision 24 hours later, sending markets crashing back down to earth.
However, there is one piece of news that perked my ears up, and it’s in an obscure section of the Big Beautiful Bill that the government is trying to push through Congress, called Section 899.
The “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” includes the most sweeping changes to the tax treatment of foreign capital in the U.S. in decades under a provision known as Section 899
U.S. foreign tax bill sends jitters across Wall Street, CNBC.com
What is Section 899?
Section 899 is a new addition to the income tax code that would be created by this bill if it gets passed in its current form, and here’s how it works.
Section 899 was created in reaction to the US administration’s annoyance with countries that implemented a Digital Services Tax, or DST. Normally, digital services like streaming services cross country borders freely, since no physical goods are crossing through customs. DST’s are sales taxes that tack a surcharge to digital services provided from outside the country, and the US has been annoyed by this because it allows foreign governments to tax large US tech companies like Google and Netflix.
The US government considers these taxes discriminatory, and labels any country that implements them as a “discriminatory foreign country,” but the number of countries this would include is quite large. Canada has a DST, and so does the UK, France, Spain, Italy, India, and Turkey. Many countries in the EU are also in the process of implementing a DST as well, so this list is going to get very large, very fast.
To punish these discriminatory countries, Section 899 adds a new withholding tax to any citizens from these countries that invest in US assets. This includes stocks, bonds, ETFs, and real estate.
The tax would be structured as a withholding tax, meaning it gets taken out of any dividends, interest, or rent paid to the foreign investor before they receive their money. The withholding tax would start at 5% in the first year, and then escalate by 5% each year until hitting a maximum of 20%.
How It Would Hurt Foreign Investors
Now, before anyone panics, it’s important to not overreact to this. This is still a draft legislation that’s passed one chamber of congress. It’s still being debated in the Senate, and it may not pass at all, or pass with changes. Two major questions in how this new tax would work remain up in the air.
The first questions is: How does this interact with international tax treaties? Even before this change, the default “statutory” withholding rate for foreign investors was 30%, but international tax treaties reduced this. The Canada-USA tax treaty, for example, set withholding tax rates for dividends and interest to 15%, and eliminated it completely for funds held inside a retirement account. If Section 899 overrides the tax treaty, this would potentially increase the withholding tax rate from 15% to a nosebleed level of 50% (30% statutory + 20% maximum increase).
The second question is: Would this higher tax be eligible to be claimed as a foreign tax credit? In Canada, taxes paid to foreign governments can be deducted against your domestic tax bill, so if you have other income that would be taxed, it’s possible for your total tax bill to be unchanged since you could offset it by paying less in domestic taxes.
Both questions are uncertain right now, and we need to know what the answer to these are before we can start figuring out what portfolio changes may be required.
How It Could Hurt the US
Going after foreign investors might seem like free money to the American government, but you have to remember, foreign investors don’t have to invest in the US. About $1T of the US national debt is owned by the UK and Canada alone, and it makes absolutely no sense for anyone in those countries to own US bonds if 50% of the interest gets taken away at source. And given that the US just lost its last AAA credit rating from Moody’s due to the ballooning national debt, US treasuries are not seen as the rock-solid safe investment they used to be.
Even if the US government is still seen as unlikely to default on their debt, Section 899 effectively confiscates a portion of the interest, which makes owning them not very attractive. And if a large number of investors start selling US treasuries at once, it will cause US bond yields to rise, which will make everything in the US more expensive, from mortgages to credit cards. It will also increase the interest rate that the US government pays, and because the national debt is so high, this becomes a big problem as interest payments take up more and more of the government’s budget.
Conclusion
The investment landscape is constantly shifting this year, with new changes to tariffs or tax rules seemingly coming every few days. It’s enough to make your head spin, and a big challenge is filtering out the signal from the noise.
Section 899 stands out as a very significant change that will fundamentally alter the rules that have been around for decades governing cross-border tax planning. It’s still early days, but if this bill becomes law, we’ll be letting everyone know what changes, if any, we’ll be making to our investments in response right here on this blog, so stay tuned!
Hi there. Thanks for stopping by. We use affiliate links to keep this site free, so if you believe in what we're trying to do here, consider supporting us by clicking! Thx ;)
Build a Portfolio Like Ours: Check out our FREE Investment Workshop!
Travel the World: Get flexible worldwide coverage for only $45.08 USD/month with SafetyWing Nomad Insurance
Multi-currency Travel Card: Get a multi-currency debit card when travelling to minimize forex fees! Read our review here, or Click here to get started!
Travel for Free with Home Exchange: Read Our Review or Click here to get started. Please use sponsor code kristy-d61e2 to get 250 bonus points (100 on completing home profile + 150 after first stay)!
Sounds like a simple solution, Canada has to remove the DST and Mr.Trump doesn’t apply this reciprocal tariff 👍
DUH. Spare us trumpeteer platitudes, Captain Obvious. We’re all sick of the insults coming from south of the border
So it’s ok for Canada to apply a tariff/ Tax but not the USA !! Got it, elbows up
Seriously? The US started this mess and is now an unreliable partner. End of story
I believe the DST was imposed close to a year prior to Trump becoming president
Honestly it doesn’t matter.
I’m confused.
Wouldn’t Canada’s (and all the other non-USA countries’) DST apply only to people who, for example, actually have a Netflix subscription? While the USA’s DST withholding would apply to all non-USA people investing in any USA financial products regardless of their Netflix subscription status?
That’s a good point. In fact, many of the people who have Netflix may not even have investments.
Of course, logic isn’t the basis for punishment in the US these days. But still an interesting point.
Of course US company will be exempt to pay the sale tax that Canadian companies need to pay. That seem fair for canadian company.
I wouldn’t drop the DST. I’d develop domestic alternatives, minimize reliance on U.S. services, quadruple the DST on U.S.-based platforms, and redirect investments toward countries that are not following the trajectory of the United States.
I’d also block Xcrement, with immediate effect!
I agree. Whatever decreases our reliance on the US is a GOOD thing. Fool me once…
Let’s be frank:
It should be known as the Little, Ugly bill from the anti-Christ.
Canada and my investments will outlive Flumpty Dumpty.
Would this impact US equities in a global index fund? Or US bonds held in a global index fund? Or both? If it happens that’s major and would require a major switching of funds for UK investors.
Yes it will most definitely affect UK investors with global index funds and Bonds..60-70% of a global fund is US. Look into Synthetic Swap based etfs
I bet companies will create derivative products to get around the tax.
How might this escalating withholding tax impact U.S. financial markets in the long term if foreign investors begin to divest or redirect their capital to other countries with more favorable tax treatment? Block Blast
I believe either the bill will be derailed, or by the time it comes into effect, companies looking to invest in the U.S. markets will have already found workarounds.
According to what I can find about Canadian DST, it affects domestic companies similarly to foreign ones.
The criteria are to have global revenues above €750 million and Canadian digital services revenue over CAD $20 million.
Regarding Canadian companies, I am only aware of Shopify, and it passes DST onto their customers.
I guess, in the end, most taxes by other companies are being passed on to customers too, so removal of DST probably is not a bad idea.
Feeling bored? Among Us Online is the perfect escape to a world full of suspense and surprises. Quick to join, easy to play, and endlessly entertaining — it’s a great way to connect with friends or make new ones. Get ready for fast-paced fun that will keep you hooked for hours!
Build meaningful connections, start a family, or spark drama—every interaction shapes your story.
Withholding or a tax? If it’s just a higher amount withheld without actually being taxed later, not a big deal. If it is actually a tax increase, then it may cause some problems.
Thanks!
I think we are all better off with less/ no taxes.
Hello…so apparently this so called “revenge tax” that the US was suggesting in this article is not happening any longer?
Will Wanderer be giving an update on how to proceed – are we ok to continue investing VUN or similar US ETF equities now? Thanks
Steal a Brainrot is an absurdly fun and chaotic game that you can’t help but get addicted to.
chicken jockey clicker
is a fun clicker game. You will continuously click on the chicken rider character to earn points. Each click helps you go further.
Chicken Jockey Clicker Game is a chaotic and funny idle clicker game in which you race chickens, win cash, and upgrade your feathered riders.
It will also increase the interest rate that the US government pays, and because the national debt is so high, this becomes a big Baseball Bros IO as interest payments take up more and more of the government’s budget.
Sharp analysis! The Big Beautiful Bill could reshape foreign investment—smart insights into its potential impact and strategic opportunities.
Thanks for sharing
Thanks for breaking down Section 899 so clearly — this is exactly the kind of analysis that helps us cut through the noise! The potential impact on cross-border investors is huge, and I appreciate you highlighting both the uncertainties and the broader implications for US debt markets. Looking forward to your follow-up once the Senate weighs in. Keep up the great work! 🙌
This analysis of Section 899 is timely. If withholding tax hits 20%, holding US bonds is too risky.
This bill is a headache. I have been thinking about diversifying. Exiting the US market seems smart now.
Your work is very good. The book is a lot of fun to read. This is a pretty lucky situation for me.
Interesting perspective on how the bill could reshape incentives for overseas capital and alter long-term investment strategies. One aspect that often gets overlooked is how policy language itself can be interpreted differently across audiences, especially international ones. Tools like a Jive language translator
can actually help break down complex phrasing and intent in a more approachable way. Overall, thoughtful analysis like this helps readers better gauge the broader economic ripple effects.
This post highlights how the Big, Beautiful Bill could materially affect foreign investor confidence and capital allocation strategies. Legislative changes like these often cascade into hiring plans, compliance priorities, and long-term operating costs across markets. When assessing such impacts, it helps to factor in regional employment obligations like the Qatar Gratuity Formula to get a clearer picture of workforce-related exposure. Overall, the analysis underscores the importance of pairing policy awareness with local regulatory understanding before making investment decisions.
This piece does a great job highlighting how shifting policies can reshape confidence and long-term strategies for overseas capital. It’s interesting to compare that level of regulatory complexity with how clarity and structure matter in other systems too, whether financial or strategic. I’ve seen similar value in well-organized resources like Persona Fusion Chart that break down complex mechanics into something more approachable. Overall, thoughtful analysis like this helps readers better understand where risks and opportunities may actually lie.
Interesting take on how the bill could reshape foreign investment behavior, especially for long-term capital planning. Policy shifts like this often push investors to look for broader timing and risk signals beyond pure fundamentals, and tools that track cycles can add context. I’ve been cross-checking trends using a current transit chart to see how macro moves line up with global sentiment shifts. It doesn’t replace financial analysis, but it’s useful for framing uncertainty. Overall, this bill seems likely to change not just where money flows, but when it moves.
This is a clear and helpful explanation of Section 899 and its background, especially the connection to digital services taxes. I appreciate content that breaks down complex topics like this in an easy way—just like simple tools I use daily, such as instagram video download. Thanks for sharing!
Really appreciate this breakdown of Section 899 and its potential ripple effects on cross-border investment flows. As someone tracking both US and international markets, the uncertainty around withholding tax escalation makes it crucial to stay informed through clear, accessible content like this. I find that having the right tools for quick access to information matters more than ever — personally, I rely on fastdl.app for grabbing media and resources efficiently when researching across platforms. Looking forward to seeing how this plays out once the Senate finalizes its version.
kart bros is a fun way to compete with friends and earn points in each race. It’s always a fun and interesting tournament that tests your driving talents on varied tracks.
Really insightful post—great breakdown of how this bill could impact foreign investors and the broader market. I appreciate how clearly you explained the implications. When I need a quick break from reading finance topics, I like checking out snapinsta—simple and fun!
Great breakdown—this really helps explain the impact on foreign investors in a simple way! Learned a lot about the risks and tax changes. Saving this while taking a break and browsing descargar videos de instagram for a bit of chill time ✨
Great breakdown—makes a complex topic about foreign investors much easier to understand! Really insightful and well explained. Saving this while taking a break and browsing igsnapinsta for some light downtime ✨
Great insights. I’ve been exploring AI image tools like anyscene lately—the creative possibilities are pretty impressive.
Nice article! wordlehint is actually pretty helpful for solving tricky Wordle guesses without completely spoiling the answe
This bill targeting foreign investors is wild. To take my mind off it, I’ve been playing country flag quiz to learn flags. It’s a fun break from all this trade talk!
I routinely post my quordle scores on social media. It’s great to watch how other people do the same challenge and the tactics they employ.
This honestly reminds me of the kind of chaotic energy you see on steal-brainrot
That’s a really interesting point about DST and reciprocal tariffs, Graham. It does make you wonder about the unintended consequences of these policies. I’m still trying to wrap my head around all the moving parts of the “Big, Beautiful Bill” and how it might impact cross-border investing. Thanks for breaking it down!
Audio Visualizer is a solid choice for beginners. Audio Visualizer
The escalating withholding tax structure is concerning, but the real issue here is what happens with existing international tax treaties. You mention the Canada-USA example where a nosebleed 50% combined rate would devastate foreign bond holdings—that’s the sticking point. If Section 899 overrides treaty protections without offering foreign tax credits, you’d essentially tank foreign appetite for US debt at exactly the moment the Treasury needs it most. I use a financial data tool pinterest downloader to track these changes across borders, and the consensus among international investors is clear: they’ll simply reallocate. The US can’t afford to be that punitive.
This is such a clear, level-headed breakdown of a genuinely complicated issue. I really appreciate how you cut through the noise and laid out both sides of the equation without spinning it into panic. The way you framed the uncertainty is refreshing—solid, practical analysis. Looking forward to the update if this moves forward! choicer voicer game