- Reader Case: Struggling to Get to FI with a Special Needs Child - June 5, 2023
- Why HomeExchange Beats Airbnb - May 22, 2023
- Let’s Go Exploring! Da Nang, Vietnam: The Next Digital Nomad Paradise? - May 8, 2023
The week after I came back from my world trip, my friend Selena invited me over to her place.
Selena lives with her husband, Rick, in a shiny new condo building in downtown Toronto. Even though it has a pool and roof top patio, Selena and Rick hardly ever uses them.
“I’m so happy you’re back”, she said, giving me an air kiss on each cheek. “I was worried you’d have too much fun traveling and never come back.”
“Actually…” I said sheepishly, “I’m just here until June. Then we’re heading off to Japan.”
“What?! You’re going to keep traveling? How?”
I resisted the urge to roll my eyes. Selena was one of the first people I told when we become Financially Independent, and one of the last people I saw before we left on our trip. “Passive income, investments. Remember? We talked about this?”
“Oh wow, that sounds so awesome,” she said, sighing. “I wish we could do it too…but we’re never going to be able to stop working.”
“Why? “ I asked.
“Well”, she said, averting Rick’s, eyes. “Because we need at least $100,000/year to live on.”
I looked around. Montauk Sofa, Herman Miller office chair, Harry Winston catalogues on her desk. No surprise there.
Rick rolled his eyes but didn’t say anything.
“And with those kind of expenses, we’ll NEVER retire.”
“Does the $100,000 a year include your mortgage?”
“Okay, so how much was this place?
For a condo? My eyebrow shot up.
“I know, I know. It’s expensive. But you know me and expensive things.” She said, picking up her Louis Vuitton purse and cradling it like a $10, 000 designer baby. “I mean, look how pretty Sally is! How could anyone resist her? Don’t you think she deserves to have two sister bags?”
Selena is more protective of her bags than most people are of their kids. One time she left “Sally” on the couch under Rick’s coat, and he, unknowingly, sat on it. When she found out, she pulled out the Lego Millennium Falcon he spent 8 months putting together, smashed it to pieces, and then threatened to set the whole thing on fire. To this day, she leaves the Lego pieces near the front door, a warning to would-be bag abusers.
But Rick, clearly hadn’t learned his lesson. “You already have ten of those things! And they cost at least $5000 a pop!”
Selena didn’t say anything, just glanced at the broken Lego pieces, then back at him.
“Okay, Selena,”I said, hands up in surrender and stepping back a safe distance from “Sally”. “What if you could rent this place instead, keep all your expensive things, and still retire sooner?”
“What? How is that possible?” She demanded.
“Well, let me show you…”
Scenario 1: Buy the $588,888 Condo and Live the Boomer’s Dream.
With a 25% down-payment, 2.89 mortgage rate, 25 years amortization, Selena and Rick’s monthly payment is: $2065.
Doesn’t sound too bad, right?
Since she owns, she also has to pay for condo fees, insurance, and property taxes, utilities, and parking.
(All costs above are monthly)
To rent, she can get a similar condo in the same area with 2 bathrooms (Selena’s only has 1) and FREE parking, for only $1990/month!
If we look at the Price-to-Rent ratio:
PR ratio = selling price / rent *12 months
= $588,888 / $1990 *12
Okay, so what does this weird number mean?
You know how Wall Street suit people love throwing around the term P/E ratio? Like “this P/E ratio is WAY too high. That stock’s heading for the crapper. “ or “Man, that is a sweet P/E ratio. I could totally go for some of that…”
Well, what they are referring to is the Price/Earnings ratio—a measure of the stock’s price relative to the company’s earnings earnings. Historically, a P/E ratio of 16* is considered pretty good. Anything above that, and it’s considered overvalued.
And in this case, the Price/Rent ratio is just like that. The rent is that home’s “earnings”. Now if we invert that number, 1/24.66, we get a return of 4%. This is pretty shitty by real-estate investor standards.
If you ever get a chance to check out Paula Pant’s “Afford Anything” blog, read her “Renting is throwing Money away?” article . It’s mind-blowingly awesome. (Seriously, go check out her blog. The woman made a cool $1 Million with real-estate investments by the time she was 28! And I, um, sort of have a secret girl-crush on her. Ahem.)
If she says she won’t touch a property unless the P/R ratio is 8.33 or less**, you know this Condo is an investment dud.
That being said, with a combined income of $200K/year to blow, Selena and Rick can pretty much party it up right?
Okay, ladies and gents, let’s see what happens if Selena and Rick continue owning this non-producing piece of real-estate trash.
Assuming that their take home pay is around $150K (not exactly the Millennial norm, I know) and their costs are 100K, their savings rate is around 30%. Pretty good, considering the national savings rate is a paltry 5%.
Now, if you look at the graph I made below, you can see that with a 30% savings rate, they have to work for 30 years. (I don’t want to bore you with all the math behind this, but if you really want to see it, click here)
When I told Selena this, she just glared at me and crossed her arms. “Yeah, 30 years is a long time, but so what? How is renting going to fix that? I still need to keep working forever to pay the rent, don’t I?”
“Actually no. By renting you can bring that number down from 30 years to 10 years”
“No really. I can prove it”…
Scenario 2: Follow the Millennial Revolution Instead:
So now that we know their expenses are 100K/year (hey, purse dry cleaning is expensive! Don’t judge), that means her variable expense is $100K minus the cost of rent, or 100K – $3412*12 = $59,056.
So if they rent instead, their total expenses go down from $100,000 to $82,936 ($59,056 + $1990*12). That’s a WAY sexier, WAY bigger 45% savings rate!
Now, I know an extra 15% doesn’t sound like much, but…
Look what happens when we plug it into the FI chart:
Her retirement period goes from 30 down to 20!
BAM! She got 10 years of her life back, just like that! And not a single LV bag was harmed in the process. All she had to do was switch from owning to renting.
But that’s not all.
Another thing I noticed when I left my 9 to 5, is that your costs actually go DOWN (by around 25%) once you stop working. Not a lot of people realize this, but retired people can actually live on WAY less.
Because when you stop working, you no longer need daily transportation, fancy work clothes, or expensive dry cleaning services.
And you have lots and lots of free time to make delicious, healthy meals, so you no longer have to choose between grabbing a Big Mac or greasy Panda Express takeout in between urgent work meetings (I never really got what’s the point of marking meetings “urgent” if they are ALL marked urgent?)
And because you’re no longer fighting other Corporate drones for vacation packages, you can travel for 50% -70% less money. (I used to spend $6000 on a 2-week vacation package in London. Once we stopped working, going to UK only cost us $2500/ for 2 people for 2 weeks. And that was the MOST expensive part of our Round-the-World trip).
I can go on and on about the wonders of not being forced to work a 9 to 5 job, but that’s an article for another day.
Anyway, because their work-related costs are now gone, Selena and Rick will only need $62,202($82,936 * 75%) per year to live.
Using the 4% rule, they’ll need to build a $1.56 Million portfolio ($62,202*25).
Sounds like a lot? Well, it is…but totally achievable with the magic of investment gains and compounding.
If they invest the 67K they save each year ($150, 000 take home pay – $82, 936) at an average market return of 6%, it’ll only take 15 years to generate a $1.56 Million portfolio!
Shocking isn’t it? That’s the advantage of being a Millennial. We have time on our side, so our money snowballs with the power of compounding.
But wait. There’s more.
Renting also will also give Selena more free time. She no longer has to worry about the extra paperwork, lawyer fees, and maintenance headaches that owners have to deal with.
Now Selena can use that extra time to pursue her dreams, and start working towards a side income.
And by the time she retires, if her and Rick can generate $15,000/year each from freelance writing and coding (and again, from my experience, this is easily achievable because this is how much I earned doing exactly this), she can lower her passive income requirements from $64,432.52/year, to $34,432.17 ($64,432.517 – $30,000 combined freelance income).
And that’s another amazing thing about becoming Financially Independent. Normally you wouldn’t even consider quitting your stressful job for a flexible, fulfilling job you love that only pays $15,000/year.
But with the passive income from your Portfolio boosting your income, there’s no reason why you can’t.
So now, Selena will only need $860,804.25 ($34,432.17 * 25) to retire. By investing $67K/year at 6% return, that’s only 10 years away!
“So, just by renting instead of buying, and not changing your lifestyle. You could quit your job in 10 years instead of 30! How awesome is that?”
For the first time ever, Selena is speechless. She’s staring at me like I’m a brand new Hermes Birkin.
And Rick’s beaming—like I just SOLD all of Selena’s Hermes Birkins.
“Okay, so where did you see the $1990/month rental again?” They both ask me at the same time.
photo credit and license: photo by Ching Ching Tsui @Flickr (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/)
Hi there. Thanks for stopping by. We use affiliate links to keep this site free, so if you believe in what we're trying to do here, consider supporting us by clicking! Thx ;)
Build a Portfolio Like Ours: Check out our FREE Investment Workshop!
Travel the World: Get covid-19 coverage for only $45.08 USD/month with SafetyWing Nomad Insurance
Multi-currency Travel Card: Get a multi-currency debit card when travelling to minimize forex fees! Read our review here, or Click here to get started!
Travel for Free with Home Exchange: Read Our Review or Click here to get started.
Earn 15% Cash-back: Earn an extra 15% back for a limited time with a Tangerine World Mastercard! Click here to sign up!
47 thoughts on “How to Retire in just 10 Years? Rent, apparently.”
Where does inflation fit into the picture?
Great question! The answer is too long for a comment box, but I’ll add it to my article list.
inflation is about 1-3 %
Check out the BoC site for some fun math.
Not to over simplify and to be honest i have not looked into it myself deeply enough so go ahead and correct me, very gently, because i bruise easily. I assume with index investing the dividends pay more cash because they pull more cash because there is more money in the market ?
Essentially, yes. “Normal” levels of inflation (1-3%) means goods cost more. But that also means those companies who are selling those goods make more, so their profits increase. Eventually, employees demand more money because goods cost more, and the cycle continues. Dividends also get increased at the same rate for the same reason: the company makes more money so in order to keep their investors happy they increase their dividends.
BMO up dividends despite bad loans from Alberta. Although they laid off 1800 people. Which is quite a lot, so let’s see what impact this layoff will have on the market
Simple answer : the 4% rule assumes your investment return tracks up & down with inflation.
I think that 6 percent return is inflation adjusted. Usually s&p index returns 8-9 percent historically.
While I agree renting can be better then owning in some scenarios, I don’t think you are factoring in everything. You didn’t offset the gains from the house. At 3% (pretty pessimistic by most standards), the property will double in 20 years and be paid off. There’s your 1 million right there. Thats not factoring any extra investment contributions, pensions, etc. And they get to continue to live the life they want.
Right there’s the dangerous tricky part that most people don’t understand. When you make projections like “this will get paid off in 20 years,” you’re implicitly saying that you’re going to stay in that place/city/job for 20 years. I don’t know what I’m going to be doing in 20 years. 5 maybe, but not 20.
So yes, I agree that sometimes owning makes sense, and that I think is defined as the house being cheap enough that you can pay off the mortgage at your current job in 5 years. Haven’t seen that one of those lately, have you?
Wonderful, inspirational blog Millenials with a Million,
You two have purpose and drive, I am afraid your friend Selena may have too much passion for luxury stuff I life, and will not have the chutzpah and the self discipline you two have. I would love her to prove me wrong.
An aside (I’m just catching up on your blog and video), but wanted to share, a couple of years ago, CBC had a program “who is using the Food Bank”. I could not believe the number of people who phoned in, regular users of FB who said they HAD A JOB but thought they would go back to school for their Masters, in order to make more money. Today they know poverty too well…with no opportunities for employment in sight.
You two are refreshing, I wish you all the best! Plus you need to blog about your travel destinations!
Thanks! It’s sad to hear about the Master students. As I said before, degrees don’t guarantee jobs. And with the lack of jobs or job instability these days (my company was doing massive layoffs when I left), sometimes it’s better to start your own business or invest to generate a passive income. That way you are in control, not employers. Hopefully they’ll find a way out.
I shall queue up some travel posts for your amusement! 🙂
I’m a home owner in Toronto; bought in 2010 for $445,000 and invested $250,000 (down payment). My current monthly costs including mortgage, property tax, utilities and insurance is $1350. If I were to rent the same house it would cost me $2800 plus utilities. Also my house is worth $900,000+ in today’s market and with paying down the mortgage I have total equity of $762,000 in 6 years! This means I got all my mortgage money back so I’ve lived in a 2 bed, 2 bath gorgeous city house on the subway for free! And I have plenty of money left over for travel cause my monthly costs are very low. Now that’s doing the math!
“My house is worth 900,000+ in today’s market”.
HA! Are you actually going to sell the house? No? Then it’s not worth anything but costs. Also you take a 5% cut as soon as you sell.
$1350 for monthly cost and NOT including maintenance and the land transfer tax you paid is hilarious. Not only that, you are ignoring all the money you’ve paid into the house over the years and not calculating the opportunity cost of investing.
$1350: This number is also suspect. When I put in a loan amount of $195,000 in the Canada mortgage calculator at an interest of 3.79% (the discount 5 year fixed rate from 2010), amortized over 25 years, with a mortgage term of 6 years, I get a monthly payment of $1004.
And given that property values are assessed every 4 years, in 2014, your house would’ve appreciated to $748,333 (give it’s so-called “900,000” current value) the last time it was assessed. That gives us a yearly Toronto property tax of $5,148.33, or $429/month. So the monthly payment + the property tax is already $1429/month, and this does not include the insurance and utilities. So how could it be $1350/month? Leaving out numbers deliberately to make your house look like a good investment is not doing math. That’s just making stuff up.
I love how people do funny many, ignore costs like maintenance and the opportunity cost of investing and then pat themselves on the back for being a genius.
“No that’s doing the math”-> Do me a favour. Don’t build any bridges.
Actually I was being very conservative when I said $900,000; looking at comparables in my area it’s well over of a million and climbing!! I don’t have to sell just like you are not cashing in your crappy stocks which you should seriously reconsider given the Trump era volatility. If anything is going to crash it’s your over-valued stocks not the housing market. If housing market crashes at least I’ll have a place to live. How are you going to pay your $2000 a month rent when stock market crashes and you’ve lost your shirt? And you can suspect all you want but my numbers don’t lie. I’ve negotiated a 2.0% interest rate since 2010 which wasn’t difficult to do given the interest rate market these past 6 years. If all you can negotiate is 3.79%, there’s something seriously wrong with you and you should seek financial advice. Also FYI Toronto taxes are cheapest in the country and I’m currently paying $3900 annually (that’s $325 per month) – that’s right for a million dollar house. House maintenance is zero! I don’t have to do anything to the house and value will NOT be affected. Are you not paying contents insurance AND utilities?? Most rentals do NOT include utilities and definitely do NOT include contents insurance. You may be able to fool a financially challenged 20 something but you are not fooling anyone else; we’re all laughing at you. You’d better do some real research before you go shooting your mouth off about home ownership and pissing your money away on rent honey.
Look sparkie, you are full of it and you know it. Mairi is right so stop manipulating the numbers and giving bad advice to those poor financially challenged 20 somethings. The rest of us (homeowners) are laughing at you, all the to the bank.
Us homeowners huh? More like crying all the way to the poor house because all your house does is cost you money. If you’re not going to sell it, the bank is laughing at you, not the other way around.
Keep yelling into the internet without showing any valid math. No wonder so many “homeowners” think they’re so rich but in reality are bleeding money. Don’t buy a house if you can’t do math.
at least we’ll never be homeless; did you sell your stocks yet sparkie? hahaha…
Don’t need to. It pays me dividends to travel the world. But slaving away at a job to pay for an overpriced house sounds perfect for you. Now get back to work…
The homeowner got 100% return on the house, compounded by leveraging mortgage at low post-financial crisis rates. That’s very lucky from 2010-2016.
The point of the article is it’s better to rent than to buy at today’s prices, which is very valid.
If enough smart millennials realized this, house prices will crash down to earth.
from a homeowner who did way better than the homeowner here
I agree with this thesis if you want to retire early and have as much liquid capital as possible. The question lies in what will happen in the later part of your life. I’m sure things will be fine if one can retire in 10 years. It’s just that inflation, at even 4-5% compounded can really hurt a renter, or a renter who eventually wants to find home base.
The RE market in Canada seems NUTS though. Why is Vancouver and Toronto so hot? What are the big industries driving such price appreciation? Is it mostly hot international money? If so… what will stop it?
Thank you for putting numbers to this movement. I am often searching for formulas on how to better understand what my intuition is telling me especially living in the land of millionaires (Vancouver). Both my partner and I are committed renter’s (in this city) and refuse to buy into the Debt system. I am just curious how you calculate how long you will be “in retirement/alive”? Of course the earlier you retire the more money you need before retiring? How does income in retirement get calculated with investments, withdrawals, taxes, etc.? Thank you and please keep writing!
Congratulations, FC and W, on your success and thank you for your blog.
Selena and Rick — may they be well and healthy — would have been great candidates for one of Gail Vaz-Oxlade’s shows.
Thanks! I know a lot of people like S&R who earn a lot but don’t save anything. Part of the problem is the whole concept of “keeping up with the Jones”. Very destructive but very difficult to let go of. As humans, we like to feel accepted and included amongst our peers. But as we get older, people will start to realize that time is more precious than money. You can have all the fancy things in the world, but you can’t take them with you when you die. The focus should be on relationships and experiences, and it’s difficult to focus on those things if you’re so busy stressing out over work to pay for fancy things and a giant mortgage. That’s the message I’m trying to get across to my friends. We’ll see if it catches on.
In this kind of volatile market where you will get consistent 6% return, year after year for 20 year. I am trying my best, but for 8 years it is never been more than 2 %
Ick! What are you investing in? The last 8 years was a giant non-stop equity bull market!
I’m on board with this, but the general population won’t. What about the argument about equity in the home vs giving rent away to a landlord?
I think overall this is a good lesson for those in very expensive cities, but ultimately you have to take the time to do the proper due diligence for your own situation to determine what would be best.
There are certain markets like Toronto or LA where in fact renting would be a mere fraction of the cost of the mortgage and every other cost, but you should also factor in how much of your mortgage payment is going toward equity in the home and how much is wasted on interest, even then there are tax deductibles to factor in when paying a mortgage. Conversely there may be other cities where buying a home is FAR cheaper than renting – i know in the current market I live in, rent on the beach for a 2br place can easily run you over $4k a month, whereas the mortgage would be $2.5k per month with 20% down. Even with HOA fees, etc. buying would be a much better deal.
“then there are tax deductibles to factor in when paying a mortgage.”
This is true for Americans but not for Canadians. Our mortgages is not tax deductible.
Agree that you have to do the math. Most people don’t. They just punch the number into a mortgage calculator and ignore ownership costs.
The rent in your is very expensive! The rent in Toronto is nowhere near $4k/month for a 2 br place. You can rent an entire 3 bedroom house for $2000-$2500 (utilities included).
Are you in SF?
Hi, my question is whether or not you considered that rents typically and continually increase in hot markets especially. How will this scenario be accurate without putting rental increases into the equation. I have been a life long renter. In the past 15 years I have had to move four times as properties sold etc. Each time these moves cost money which also needed to be added in to my chart. I’m thinking now that I might have been just as far ahead or more so finacially and a lot more “at home” if I had purchased. Your thoughts?
4 times in the past 15 years doesn’t seem that bad.
We rented in Toronto for 9 years and not once did we have to move. My strategy going forward is to rent apartments rather than houses. Unlikely that the owner will kick out the entire building to cash out. I also think as renters we have the ability to move to “renters’ market” areas (like edmonton, for example). Apartments also require a lot less time for maintenance, which frees up time to do things I love.
And when you say “rent increases”, keep in mind that when you own, you have “ownership increases” as well. When your property values go up, so do your property taxes. Cost of maintenance/condo fees, insurance, real-estate agent fees, these all rise to the rate of inflation.
In terms of owning, you’d have to do the math to see if it makes sense. The cost of moving 4 times in 15 years is NOTHING compared to the cost of ownership (property taxes, real-estate agent fees, land transfer tax, home inspection, insurance…none of these costs add to the equity of your home yet you have NO CHOICE but to pay them).
The rental laws across Canada vary greatly, I am interested to know how (or if) rental increases factor into equation (if I remember correctly Toronto is an open market)? In Vancouver our “rent control” laws set a maximum increase of ~3% per year, not including renovictions (which I’m sure could be assigned an annual percentage as the market rental rate have been increase faster than the government controlled rate the past few years and there is a real life to any home before it needs remodel, meaning at some point you will be forced to reset to the market rate).
Very interesting blog, I imagine if more people understood the costs (both opportunity and actual) associated with ownership or rental, their decisions would be much different. Not everyone is going to have the economic capacity to retire in their 30s, but the dream for many of the boomers now is retirement at all and by at least 60 work should be a choice.
Yes Renting can be less costly than owning.. it just depends on the market and your location. However, I don’t know anyone who can consistently save $67,000/year for 15 – 20 years. That’s completely unrealistic unless you live on the gravy train.
Interesting analysis. If you account for the lost investment returns of the down payment and also equity build up to eventually having the house paid off, it would be even more useful.
I live in South Carolina in the USA. My house was
price = 139,500 USD
zillow says the rent would be $1250/month
down payment = 20%*price = $27,900
appreciation = SLOW AND LOW. But at least its stable. Maybe 1%/yr.
I’ve done the math a few different ways, and I think buying was right for us. We have 3 kids. I have a giant spreadsheet that progresses with age, and spending drops significantly when the house is paid off. Maybe we’ll move before then, and we will take some equity with us but lose 6% to sales cost unless we sell it ourselves (which is doubtful).
But I’ll keep this in mind for future situations. When the kids are gone or we more to a different market, renting might make plenty of sense.
While reading the afford anything post I realized a little more info would be helpful:
interest rate = 3.125%
15 yr mortgage
principle + interest payment = $777/mo
Current principle/mo payoff ~$580/mo (building $580/mo out of $967/mo payment)
So the “throw away” part is $967-$580 ~$393/mo currently. Clearly, this changes with time.
We’re retired in our 40s but we do have four kids and are a second marriage – we retired from starting again after ten years of working. And no, we’re not boomers and yes we did restart at the same level as those in their 20s with their education behind them as a starting position due to divorce.
It is not from index investing mostly though – it is largely from rental income and appreciation, plus owning a small business.
The appreciation on a primary residence is not locked in until you sell – you can HELOC it and use the money to buy an investment property – or stocks – and deduct the interest. And, to be fair, any homeowner knows that there are additional costs to ownership other than the mortgage. It is not rocket science but simple math that impacts 70% of the population in their pocketbooks.
Your prejudice against owning is like others’ prejudice against renting – based on wanting to be right and then believing others must be wrong. Be nice if you could evaluate options and realize there is more than one way to the goal post. But that byline might not be as effective as “rent and retire early” because home ownership is for suckers.
Really hard to stomach when your example is a condo in TO and TO has experienced far higher rates of appreciation in recent years than the market and this is generally on leveraged capital so the ROI is even higher and tax exempt. None of that is figured into your analysis. You (wrongly) assume you can’t access the capital until a sale and that the sale will cost 5% of the purchase price. In a hot market you can sell a house yourself and where I live you can just pay for a mere listing on realtor.ca
There is risk in everything. The question is how you mitigate it and maximize returns. Choose to buy a house and buy in an area that is prone to appreciation and you’ll make a tax exempt windfall when you sell. Buy in this same area and be unable to hold through a downturn or uptick in mortgage rates and you can lose. Don’t do it the second way. Add a suite and gain income to see you through if you need to. Rent out the whole thing and move somewhere cheaper in hard times. Looking at the long-term returns on RE for the last 40 years if you can hold for seven years your risk of not making money is almost zero in TO – just like the stock market except for the power of leverage when it goes your way.
There are so many ways to go and it is, imo, usually better financially to diversify. If you want to retire fast buy a primary residence with a secondary suite and invest in index funds and start a small business if you are so inclined.
If your goal is to travel the world maybe you can just rent out your house furnished like we do. It more than pays for our trips and I really love having a home that is ours to come back to and spend time with our family in. I don’t mind the responsibilities of home ownership given the benefits and sense of security.
Why would I buy a house and rent it out when index investing costs me next to nothing, I don’t have to worry about tenants messing up my house or things falling apart? I also get paid dividends to do zero work or upkeep. And I don’t have to time the market.
Real-estate investing is a way to get cashflow but that still requires a lot of work and experience. Index investing is the most diversified, passive way to earn income without having to do active work. I also get exposure to real-estate with REITs that pay me a distribution without having to do any maintenance. If you love being a landlord, real-estate investing is another way to become financially independent. But I prefer spending time doing things I love rather than getting calls at 3am in the morning to fix a toilet. Just not my thing.
But hey, if you are happy with your real estate investments, by all means continue living your awesome life. Why are you even wasting time on this site?
Why waste time here?
Because dialogue is important and hopefully there is room for alternate viewpoints so readers consider all options logically when being presented with what might possibly be a one-sided viewpoint. And one that might not help some folks for whom a house is going to work out better. Not everyone wants to live in a cheap apartment, especially if they have kids. We live in Victoria and there is a shortage of this type of rental for families.
It really doesn’t have to be a black and white analysis does it? The ROI on a leveraged house purchase has been excellent over the long-term – and you have cheap leverage to work with. You don’t have the experience of being a homeowner so there are some things you are estimating that aren’t based on personal experience and I find you have a tendency towards confirmation bias in this area based on my experience as an owner.
I appreciate that you did permit my point given it has an alternate viewpoint. I also appreciate that building a portfolio while renting cheap is another way to go and it has been good for you and your husband. And you have done very well!
I don’t spend my time fixing toilets. We have people we hire for this. You might be interested in checking this blog out – a very smart millennial family that is travelling the world based on rental income. They were both low income teachers in the US – much less than you folks earned. They have property managers and buy houses without viewing in many cases. http://www.adventuringalong.com/
More than one way to get to FI. A house can be part of it and can have better ROI than index investing with not much more work.
All very good points. Like I said, real-estate investing is not the same as buying a house to live in. But is more work than index investing. Even if you hire a property manager, you still have to vet them and you still need to be involved to fix problems. And if you end up with bad tenants who squat or destroy your property, a property manager is not going to help since the law is on the side of the tenant and not the landlord. I see real-estate investing as the same amount of work and risk as starting a business. But some people are better suited to it and they have done well. But this is not a blog about real-estate investing. This is a blog about financial independence through renting and investing.
Appreciate your alternative viewpoints though! Thanks for sharing your experience.
If Selena is so attached to luxury things like her purses she would never think like a FI/RE. People are just like that unfortunately. They don’t value things that are real important, only those which costs a lot….but guess what…when you die you can’t take your purses with you !
“when you die you can’t take your purses with you !”
So true. Only after you step way from all the consumeristic crap, do you realize that experiences and relationships always trumps “stuff”.
Nice piece. All to often I think people don’t factor into the equation is the stress of owning a house, and we should put a dollar amount on this stress. Worrying about property taxes, worrying about maintenaince, worrying about the housing market, worrying about losing a steady stream of income to pay the mortgage, etc. Houses are a very illiquid asset, and picking up and moving town is a multi-month affair. Plus, with all those rooms, you’ll probably have to fill them with things…
With that in mind, would you also recommend leasing a car vs buying a car? Currently using public transportation, but in the long run for work (need to travel from site to site) would you recommend one over the other?
I would recommend doing the math and figure out which one makes more sense. Can you expense part of it if it’s for work to go from site to site?
Hey there Firecracker!
You’re a hoot! Love your site! I was wondering, what are your thoughts about rental properties? A lot of your posts surrounding the downsides to homeownership is related to single family homes. From a conceptual perspective, what do you think about the financial viability of multi family units?
Real estate investing is a perfectly valid way to get to FI, however, it’s not easy nor passive (especially in the beginning). I would say, compared to index investing, it’s more like a business. That being said, if you’re good with fixing things around the house, don’t mind being a landlord, it could be a good fit. For more information about real estate investing, check out Paula Pant’s site:
The argument against owning a home seems to go hand-in-hand with price. If people lived in a cheaper area it might be better, financially, to buy instead of rent. In my area, mortgages can be had for $1800 – $2500 for a 3 – 4 bedroom house and rent for the same can cost $2200 – $2700. When you figure all the fees for that $1800 mortgage cost about $200 bucks you’re looking at OWNING a 3 bedroom home for $2000 monthly (TOTAL).