Reader Case: How Can I Retire Early with Mortgage Debt?

• Author
• Recent Posts

Follow me

FIRECracker

FIRECracker is a world-travelling early retiree. She used to live in one of the most expensive cities in Canada, but instead of drowning in debt, she rejected home ownership. What resulted was a 7-figure portfolio, which has allowed her and her husband to retire at 31 and travel the world. Their story has been featured on CBC, the Huffington Post, CNBC, BNN, Business Insider, and Yahoo Finance. To date, it is the most shared story in CBC history and their viral video on CBC's On the Money has garnered 4.5 Million views.

Follow me

Latest posts by FIRECracker (see all)

• Why HomeExchange Beats Airbnb - May 22, 2023
• Let’s Go Exploring! Da Nang, Vietnam: The Next Digital Nomad Paradise? - May 8, 2023
• The Worst Travel Day Ever - April 24, 2023

Guess what? It’s time for another reader case! With all the questions lately about interest rate hikes, banking instability, and spiking mortgage payments, this one is timely:

Hello Millennial Revolution,

We are a couple with no kids who have been dreaming of early retirement, but unfortunately, we only discovered your book last year and are approaching 48 years old. We moved from Brazil to Canada in 2013 and have been working hard to achieve financial independence. However, we made the mistake of buying two properties in Toronto and having a large mortgage with a high-interest rate.

Despite this setback, we are determined to retire early and travel the world, mainly in Asia and South America, starting at age 52.

We have two possible plans and would love your expert opinion:

Plan 1: In 2027, we will sell our properties, pay off the mortgages, and invest in equities. This and our savings should put us in the CAD 2 million range. We believe we could sustain our lifestyle using the 4% rule and future retirement pensions at 65.

Plan 2: In 2027, we will rent out our properties, move to South Asia, and live off our savings until we run out of money. Once our savings are depleted, we will sell the Toronto properties and live off the proceeds plus the retirement pensions at 65.

However, our plans have been complicated by a recent setback. I was just laid off from my job in February 2023, which has cut our income in half until I find another job. This has made us consider retiring now instead of waiting another four years.

We would greatly appreciate your expert advice on our situation. Here are some details about our finances:

·      Gross/net annual family income *still considering two salaries: CAD 221,000 / CAD 171,300

·      Monthly family spending: CAD 9,300 (including annual travelling +  leisure)

·      Debts:

o   Townhouse mortgage (primary residence): Variable interest rate at 5.4%, minimum monthly payment of CAD 2,950, and outstanding balance of CAD 464,968

o   Condo mortgage (rent property): Fixed interest rate at 3.16%, minimum monthly payment of CAD 1,400 (mortgage should be refinanced in May/23) and outstanding balance of CAD 310,000

o   Car loan: Nissan Kicks 2019 – Fixed interest rate 1.9%, minimum monthly payment of CAD 433, and outstanding balance CAD 7,872

·      Fixed assets:

o   Townhouse in Toronto (market value: CAD 950,000, and we could rent it for more than CAD 3K monthly

o   Condo in Toronto (market value: CAD 500,000) we currently rent it for CAD 1,650/month but could easily be rented for 2K due to the location, and it is entirely high-end furnished

o   Condo in Brazil (market value: CAD 100,000) rented for only CAD 290/Monthly

·      Investments and savings:

o   Brazil: CAD 195,445 (stocks and bonds)

o   Canada: CAD 190,244 (stocks and bonds) and CAD 30,000 (cash)

We understand our situation is imperfect, but we are determined to make early retirement a reality. We hope that you’ll be able to help us achieve our goal.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Retireby52

Yikes! With a variable interest rate of 5.4% on one of their properties, and another one coming up for renewal in 2 months, this doesn’t bode well for this couple.

When interest rates were scraping the floor and housing prices were rising, it was easy to feel optimistic, but as we all know, things could turn on a dime.

When they both had high salaries, there might have been some way to make this situation work, but unfortunately one of them got laid off. And sadly, as high paying jobs go, no matter how much you make, there is no such thing as guaranteed job security.

Can we get them out of this sticky situation?

Let’s summarize their finances:

Right away, we see they’re in trouble. After the job loss, with their net income cut in half to $85,600 and annual spending of $111,600, they are in the red by $26,000 a year, or $2166.67 per month!

They didn’t break down their monthly spending, but I suspect the reason why it’s so high is because of their primary residence. The mortgage alone is $2950. Once you add in property taxes, insurance, maintenance, that cost takes up nearly half of their monthly spending. So right away, we know that they can’t afford to keep doing what they’re doing, unless they find a 2^nd job to stop the bleeding.

So what can they do? What moves do they have? Can they even afford to keep the house and still retire? Let’s find out, by…MATHING THAT SHIT UP.

Plan 1: Sell off all real estate and rent

First of all, let’s examine what happens if we liquidate everything and go back to being renters.

If they sold their properties and paid the real estate agent fees of 5% (Canada) and 6% (Brazil) respectively, they would have a net worth of $1,471,500 (Proceeds from sale) – $782,840 (mortgage balance) + $415,689 (liquid assets) = $1,104,349.

They spend $111,600/year, but a big chunk of that is the mortgage and home ownership costs (property taxes, maintenance, insurance, etc). If we break out these ownership costs, we can see that they add a significant amount to the cost of owning a house.

So, if they got rid of it, that would save them $4326/month.

Their rental property costs them $1400/month in mortgage, but that also doesn’t include property taxes, condo fees, insurance. If we add that all in, we get…

So that means the condo is costing them $2121.67/month, and their renters paying them $1650/month, for a total NEGATIVE cash flow of $471.67/month.

So getting rid of the their primary residence would save them approximately $4326/month and selling the investment condo would save them $471.67/month.

That being said, they would also need to find a place to rent. What if they were to downsize to a small rental? Well, currently, the average rent for a 1 bedroom in Toronto is $2500.

So their new monthly spending would be $9300 (current monthly spend) – $4326 (saved from primary residence) – $471.67 (saved from condo) + $2500 (rent) = $7002.33/month or $84,027.96/year. With their current one person $85,600 after-tax salary, they’d be just above water and able to save $85,600 – $84,027.96 = $1572.04. Their new FI number would be $2,077,500 and their net worth right now is $1,104,349, so if we throw it into a projection, it would take…

So if we do all this, our couple can retire in 11 years. This would mean they’d be 59 instead of 52. Not too bad, but let’s see if we can better.

Plan 2: Rent out the properties, move to SE Asia to reduce expenses

What if they rent out their primary residence, and move to South East Asia to reduce their expenses?

The Retirement “O-X” Visa allows retirees to stay in Thailand up to 10 years if they are at least 50 years old, have a bank deposit of at least 3 million Baht (or $121,000 CAD, $88,000 USD), and buy health insurance coverage of at least 400,000 Baht ($16,000 CAD, $12,000 USD).

They should be able to qualify for this in 2 years, so in the meantime, they could travel through Southeast Asia on tourist visas.

Theoretically, they should easily be able to live on $30,000 CAD/year even with the recent inflation, while eating out and getting massages every other day since we just did this recently.

That being said, if you haven’t lived in Thailand before, I would advise taking a sabbatical from work (if possible) and try living there for 90 days first (you can get a 60 day visa and extend it) to see if you like it. Don’t just automatically assume you’ll be happy living abroad in another country if you’ve never lived there before. Vacations are not the same as long time travel.

To generate $30K/year in passive income, they would need a portfolio size of $750,000, and without selling their properties to unlock the equity, they would only have investible assets of $415,689, which isn’t enough.

They mentioned they want to rent out the properties while they are abroad. Would the cash flow be enough to cover their expenses in Thailand?

Let’s look at our cost ownership table again. Most of the numbers would be the same, but you’d have to add in a property manager to take care of the place while you’re gone. Property managers typically charge 6-8% of the monthly rent. Our readers estimated they’d be able to rent out this property for $4000 a month, so that’s what we’ll use as a conservative estimate.

This means that if they were to rent it our for their estimated $4000/month, they’d be bleeding cash every month. Super. Oh, and given that the interest rate is variable, their mortgage will be going up soon, so this bleed will get even…gushier. Eww. That sounded gross.

Now, what about the investment condo?

The condo is being rented out for $1650/month, even though their mortgage is $1400/month and set to increase in 2 months when they refinance. If their mortgage interest rate jumps from 3.16% to 5.5%, their monthly mortgage would increase to $1,831.

Add in insurance, condo fees, etc., this is how much their condo would cost them per month:

Their current tenants are paying only $1650, so this property is also bleeding cash.

So far for both properties, they’re already in negative cashflow territory and we haven’t even looked at the Brazillian property being rented out for a measly $290/month.

Under plan 2, unless they manage to rent it out for way higher than they’re getting now, both properties are bleeding cash to the tune of about $1500 a month. This adds $1500 x 12 = $18,000 onto their SE Asia living expenses, bringing it to $48,000, and with their liquid assets of $415,689, they run out of money less than 10 years. They said they want to spend it down until they can collect CPP and OAS (which is our government-run pension plan, similar to Social Security), but that wouldn’t start until age 65, which is 17 years away, so they would run out of money before then. So, plan 2 is a bust.

So, with rising mortgage costs, negative cashflow from their properties, high expenses and the loss of half their income, they are definitely not going to retire by 52.

Conclusion

OK here’s the situation.

If our reader stays where they are now, their single salary isn’t enough to support their massive living expenses. They will bleed money every year until they run out and lose it all.

Going to Thailand doesn’t help. Even renting out the townhouse doesn’t help, unless they convince somebody to rent it out way over market value, all their real estate holdings are still cash flow negative. They’d be bleeding a little slower, but still bleeding.

However, if you sell everything, downside your living expenses and move back to renting, there is hope on the horizon because their living expenses would drop below their salary. They wouldn’t be able to save, but if they take the proceeds of over $1M and invest it carefully, time should eventually rescue them in about 10 years.

Or they need to immediately get a second job.

Is early possible? Yes, but it would take some drastic changed. Meaning, sell all the real estate, and then take an absolute hatchet to their expenses. In order to meet their 52 retirement target, their expenses would need to be cut in half, from $111,600/year to $55,800/year. With one after-tax income of $85,650, this means they could still save $29,850/year. And if get every penny out of equity out of their properties, it would take them:

Less than 3 years to reach FI, which means they would be 51 years old, meeting their dreams of retiring by 52. I’m doubtful that they can reduce their expense by that much. Hopefully they can prove me wrong since they don’t have kids to support.

If this analysis seems dire, it’s because it is. Massive fixed spending caused by owning 3 homes, one of which is in another country, insufficient liquid savings, and rising mortgage costs, followed by a job loss? There are no easy fixes to this, but this is the only realistic pathway to retirement I see for this couple. Sell all their property, invest everything they own into passive income-producing assets, CUT half their spending, and then MAYBE in 3 years they might be able to pull it off.

What do you think?  What would you do in their situation?

---

Hi there. Thanks for stopping by. We use affiliate links to keep this site free, so if you believe in what we're trying to do here, consider supporting us by clicking! Thx ;)

Build a Portfolio Like Ours: Check out our FREE Investment Workshop!

Travel the World: Get covid-19 coverage for only $45.08 USD/month with SafetyWing Nomad Insurance

Multi-currency Travel Card: Get a multi-currency debit card when travelling to minimize forex fees! Read our review here, or Click here to get started!

Travel for Free with Home Exchange: Read Our Review or Click here to get started.

Earn 15% Cash-back: Earn an extra 15% back for a limited time with a Tangerine World Mastercard! Click here to sign up!